The
Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) has issued a show-cause
notice on Hajmola, a popular product of Dabur known for its digestive
properties, for the issue of classification. The problem is whether the same
must be deemed as a normal candy or an Ayurvedic preparation.
After the
investigation, the Show Cause Notices (SCN) have been issued. The
company had received a summons earlier. Before the investigation, they made
specific submissions. The problem is that if this is a normal candy or an
Ayurvedic preparation.
There is an
18% GST for normal candy and a 12% on Ayurvedic preparations. The company
does not respond to new developments till the time of proceeding to the press.
An identical
issue was introduced in the pre-GST regime when the Supreme Court in 2002 had
dismissed an appeal of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh, against
a ruling by the erstwhile CEGAT (Central Customs, Excise & Gold Appellate
Tribunal, now known as the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal or
CESTAT), which CEGAT repeated that Hajmola Tablets are Ayurvedic medicines.
In another
ruling by the Allahabad High Court in 2016, when Uttar Pradesh’s
Commercial Tax Department appealed against a ruling via a tribunal which ruled
that ‘Chyawanpras,’ ‘Hajmola’ and ‘Hajmola Candy’ are medicines for tax.
The Department
contested the ruling by asking: “Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the
case, the tribunal was legally justified in holding ‘Chyawanprash,’, ‘Hajmola’
and ‘Hajmola Candy’ to be medicines even though they are not sold in the
medical shops but rather in general stores?”
The court
observed the tribunal’s statement, which expressed that Dabur India has
manufactured all three products for many years under a license granted to it by
the licensing officer of Ayurvedic and Unani Services under the Drug and
Cosmetics Act, 1940.
The tribunal
ruled that for any product manufactured under a license for a drug, the nature
of the product would be that of a medicine.
The court, the
matter of Lal Dant Manjan, which is manufactured based on a license issued
under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and would be treated as a medicine
or drug.
“The place of
sale of any product is not a relevant criteriona for determining its nature as
to whether it is a drug/medicine or an item of general use;, rather, the
relevant criteriona is the license under which such a product is being
manufactured, and if the license is for the purposes of manufacturing a drug or
medicine under the relevant statute, the product would essentially be a
drug/medicine,” it expressed while dismissing the appeal by the tax department.
After
doughnuts, Hajmola candy is the latest case of misclassification. DGGI imposes
Rs 100 crore tax notice on Mumbai-based MOD for allegedly misclassifying its
doughnut.
A 5% GST rate on doughnuts, the chain has been charged, asserting they are entitled to restaurant services rather than the 18% tax applicable on bakery items. The notice has been stayed, but the case is pending in the Bombay HC.
No comments:
Post a Comment