Thursday, July 3, 2025

GST Fraud in Madhya Pradesh: ₹130 Cr Fake ITC Scam Exposed

The Madhya Pradesh Economic Offences Wing (EOW) has recently unearthed a massive ₹130 crore GST fraud involving fake Input Tax Credit (ITC). The case highlights the growing misuse of GST registration systems for availing illegal tax credits through shell companies and bogus invoices.

Let’s break this down to understand how such scams work, what legal provisions apply, and how taxpayers and consultants can safeguard themselves.


What is Fake Input Tax Credit (ITC)?

Fake ITC refers to claiming tax credit on invoices for which no actual supply of goods or services took place. It is one of the most common GST fraud methods.

Key characteristics of fake ITC fraud:

  • Use of non-existent or paper-only firms
  • No movement of goods/services
  • Bogus GST invoices
  • ITC passed on without tax payment to the government

Madhya Pradesh Case: How the ₹130 Cr Scam Was Run

According to the EOW investigation:

  • A group of individuals created over 50 fake GST-registered firms
  • These shell companies issued bogus invoices to each other and to genuine firms
  • Fake ITC worth ₹130 crore was claimed and passed on
  • The scam was run across multiple states using forged documents

Legal action:

  • FIR filed under IPC and CGST Act, 2017
  • Arrests are likely under Sections 132(1)(b), (c), and (f) of the CGST Act
  • Properties and bank accounts are being frozen

GST Law on Fake ITC: What Does Section 132 Say?

Under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, Section 132 deals with offences and penalties for GST frauds, including fake ITC.

Key penalties:

Offence

Amount Involved

Punishment

Fake ITC without supply

> ₹5 Cr

Jail up to 5 years + fine

Repetition of offence

Any amount

Non-bailable offence

Fake invoices

> ₹2 Cr

Cognizable and non-bailable

Also, the GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 filings are now more strictly scrutinised with data analytics and AI tools by GSTN to catch such anomalies.

Red Flags That Signal Fake ITC Risk

To stay compliant, look out for these signs in your vendor ecosystem:

  • Suppliers without e-way bill or delivery proof
  • Vendors not filing GSTR-3B or GSTR-1 regularly
  • Large purchases from new/unverified GSTINs
  • Tax mismatch in GSTR-2B vs. GSTR-3B

🔍 Tip: Use the GST portal to verify vendor return filing status and GSTIN authenticity.


How to Report or Avoid GST Frauds

If you’re a taxpayer or consultant:

  • Conduct due diligence before onboarding vendors
  • Reconcile GSTR-2B with GSTR-3B monthly
  • Avoid availing ITC if supplier has defaulted in tax payment
  • Use tools or consultants to check ITC validity

To report fraud:


Legal Consequences for Involved Persons

Fraudsters may face:

  • Arrest without warrant
  • Seizure of property and bank accounts
  • Reversal of entire ITC with interest (Sec 73/74)
  • Prosecution under IPC for forgery, cheating, criminal conspiracy

Even buyers who knowingly receive fake invoices can be penalised under Section 122 of the CGST Act.


Protecting Your Business from Fake ITC Issues

Register vendors with known credentials
Use e-invoicing and proper documentation
Reconcile GST returns monthly
Keep proofs of goods received and tax paid
Avoid dealing in cash-heavy sectors with no traceability


Conclusion

The ₹130 crore GST fraud in Madhya Pradesh is a reminder of how serious fake ITC scams have become. We advises all taxpayers and consultants to follow due diligence, ensure return reconciliation, and avoid shortcuts.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Handling of Inadvertently Rejected records on IMS

Question 1: How can a recipient avail ITC of wrongly rejected Invoices/ Debit notes/ECO-Documents in IMS as corresponding GSTR-3B of same ta...