Mega GST Compliance Overhaul: A Detailed Guide to Critical Filing Changes Effective October 1st, 2025

The landscape of Goods and Services Tax (GST) compliance has just been redefined. Effective October 1st, 2025, the government has rolled out a new set of rules under the umbrella of GST 2.0 reforms. This marks a paradigm shift from a largely automated return-filing environment to one that demands mandatory taxpayer scrutiny, formal reconciliation, and proactive engagement.

At the epicenter of this change is the Invoice Management System (IMS), which has been granted statutory recognition. For every business, especially those relying on Input Tax Credit (ITC), the new filing cycle requires immediate and meticulous process changes.

---

Part I: Why the Shift? Formalizing the Invoice Management System (IMS)

The introduction of GST 2.0 and the elevation of IMS to a legal requirement are rooted in the need to clamp down on fraudulent ITC claims, minimize mismatches between supplier and recipient data, and enhance the overall transparency of the GST ecosystem.

Previously, many ITC claims were processed based on data flow that lacked a formal, mandatory acceptance mechanism from the recipient. The new system ensures that the recipient—the party claiming the credit—must actively validate the underlying transaction data before the credit can be utilized.

Key Mandate: The IMS is now the single source of truth for validating supplier-uploaded invoices and credit notes, making proactive reconciliation an absolute prerequisite for ITC claims.

---

Part II: Deep Dive into the 6 Critical Changes

These regulatory adjustments give buyers unprecedented control over their ITC claims but also impose greater responsibility and mandatory actions.

1. The End of GSTR-2B Auto-Population: A Manual Mandate

The Change Explained:

The system has ceased the automatic flow and population of Input Tax Credit (ITC) data from the auto-drafted GSTR-2B directly into the final liability return, GSTR-3B.

Practical Impact:

Businesses are now required to review the records available in the IMS and self-generate their GSTR-2B before proceeding with the GSTR-3B filing. This breaks the link of passive acceptance and mandates an active, human-verified step.

• Pre-Change Scenario: An erroneous invoice uploaded by the supplier (e.g., wrong GST rate) would automatically reflect in your GSTR-3B for credit, potentially leading to audit issues later.
• Post-Change Scenario: You must meticulously review the supplier’s uploaded invoice details in the IMS. If errors are found, the invoice must be acted upon (rejected/held) before you calculate and claim the accurate ITC in your self-generated GSTR-2B.

2. Credit Notes Require Buyer’s Affirmative Acceptance

The Change Explained:

A supplier's ability to reduce their tax liability by issuing a credit note is now contingent upon the buyer’s formal acceptance of that credit note within the IMS.

Practical Impact:

This eliminates the risk of suppliers unilaterally reducing their output liability (and the corresponding buyer's ITC) without the buyer's knowledge or consent, a frequent cause of litigation and reconciliation mismatches. If you, as the buyer, do not accept the note, the supplier cannot utilize the credit note to reduce their liability. This makes the buyer a mandatory participant in the supplier's liability adjustment process.

3. Strict 30-Day Limit on 'Pending' Credit Notes

The Change Explained:

While the system allows a buyer to mark a supplier credit note as "Pending" (if verification is ongoing), this status is strictly limited to one subsequent return period.

Practical Impact:

This introduces a deadline for action. If a supplier credit note is marked "Pending" in the current month, you have only the next filing cycle to finalize its status. After this single-period grace, the system will necessitate the credit note to be either Accepted or Rejected. This prevents the indefinite postponement of verification and ensures timely closure of transactions.

4. Mandatory Audit Trail: Leveraging Buyer Remarks

The Change Explained:

Buyers are now equipped with the functionality to add detailed remarks when they choose to reject an invoice or put a supplier’s invoice on hold within the IMS.

Practical Impact:

This feature is a game-changer for transparency and audit preparedness. Instead of a simple "Reject," you can now specify:

• "Rejected – Goods not delivered."
• "Held – Quantity Mismatch (Invoice says 100, received 90)."

These remarks provide an instantaneous, formal audit trail, justifying the action taken on the invoice and facilitating smoother communication and resolution with the supplier.

5. Flexibility: Partial ITC Reversal on Credit Notes

The Change Explained:

When a credit note is received from a supplier, the buyer now has the flexibility to process a partial ITC reversal, rather than being forced to reverse the full amount.

Practical Impact:

This addresses real-world business scenarios such as partial returns of goods, minor disputes, or discrepancies where only a portion of the transaction is contested or subject to the credit note.

• Scenario: A credit note is issued for 100 items, but your business has only returned 60. You can now reverse ITC corresponding only to those 60 items, ensuring you retain the eligible ITC for the 40 items kept.

6. Invoice-Wise Uploads for GSTR-7

The Change Explained:

TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) deductors must now ensure that the information filed in GSTR-7 is provided on an invoice-wise basis, mandating a higher level of transactional granularity.

Practical Impact:

This reform aligns the reporting of TDS transactions with the invoice-level detail seen across other key returns (GSTR-1, GSTR-2B), further integrating the data and enhancing its verifiability on the GST portal.

---

Part III: Compliance Strategy – Your Next Steps

The critical changes under GST 2.0 shift the burden of proof and verification squarely onto the taxpayer. To maintain compliance and cash flow, businesses must:

1. Prioritize Reconciliation: Make monthly ITC reconciliation via the IMS and GSTR-2B mandatory before GSTR-3B filing. This is no longer a best practice; it's a legal requirement for claiming credit.
2. Internal Process Training: Train accounts and compliance teams on the new functionalities, especially the use of Buyer Remarks and the 'Pending' status timeline.
3. System Readiness: Ensure that your accounting and ERP software is updated to handle these changes, particularly the self-generation of GSTR-2B and the integration with the IMS interface for accepting/rejecting credit notes.

The new GST compliance era is defined by verification and transparency. By proactively adapting to these IMS-centric rules, businesses can ensure they remain compliant, minimize disputes, and secure their legitimate Input Tax Credit.